Further information on UA 18/07 (AMR 51/018/2007, 24 January 2007)
Death penalty / Legal concern
USA (North Carolina) James Edward Thomas (m), black, aged 51
26 January 2007
On 25 January 2007 in Raleigh, North Carolina, Wake County Superior Court Judge Donald Stephens blocked the execution of James Thomas who was scheduled to be put to death on 2 February 2007 for the murder of Teresa Ann West in June 1986.
Judge Stephens’ order followed an appeal filed by lawyers for James Thomas and fellow death row inmate Marcus Robinson (see UA 14/07, 18 January, http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGAMR510142007). Their petition for injunctive relief cited a decision taken by the North Carolina Medical Board on 17 January 2007 prohibiting doctors from participating in executions in the state. Under the terms of the decision, medical professionals would not be disciplined for being present at an execution, but are prohibited from administering the lethal drugs or assisting with the execution. The lawyers argued that the absence of a physician monitoring and supervising the condemned prisoner’s medical condition created the risk that the execution would cause pain and suffering that would violate the constitutional ban on cruel and unusual punishment.
Following a hearing, Judge Stephens noted that the state correctional authorities had not challenged the legal authority of the Medical Board to prohibit the participation of doctors in executions. He also noted that the authorities had chosen to comply with the Medical Board’s decision so that physicians would no longer directly participate in executions. According to Judge Stephens’ order, the correctional authorities have said that "although a physician will be present during an execution, that physician will not supervise or participate in the injection of any drugs or the monitoring of the prisoner’s medical condition". The state further asserted that its current execution procedures could be lawfully carried out without the participation of a physician, but rather by using other trained personnel.
Judge Stephens noted that the state’s current position differed from the position taken in previous executions, and that the change was "significant". However, he further noted that this change in execution protocol had only been approved by the Secretary of Corrections and the Warden of Central Prison (where death row is housed). The judge wrote : "The court is of the opinion that the Secretary of Corrections and the Warden may not significantly alter the existing protocol for the manner and method of executions, which protocol has previously received court approval as constitutional, without first submitting such substantial changes to the Governor and the Council of State for review and approval." Without such approval, Judge Stephens wrote, the execution would violate state law. (The Council of State is made up of elected members of the cabinet : the Lieutenant Governor, the Secretary of State Elaine Marshall, the Attorney General, the Commissioner of Agriculture, the Commissioner of Insurance, the Commissioner of Labor, the Superintendent of Public Instruction, the State Treasurer, and the State Auditor).
As a result of the order, James Thomas’s stay of execution is indefinite, and executions in North Carolina are effectively on hold. This follows the recent de facto moratoriums on executions in Florida and California while the authorities attempt to "fix" their lethal injection protocols (see USA : New Year’s resolution : End a cruel and outdated punishment, December 2006, http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGAMR512052006).
In six other states - Arkansas, Delaware, Maryland, Missouri, Ohio and South Dakota - almost all executions are being stayed by the courts in the face of lawsuits challenging lethal injection procedures. In Illinois and New Jersey there are formal moratoriums on executions. In New Jersey, a study commission set up by the state legislature has concluded that the death penalty should be abolished (see New Jersey Death Penalty Study Commission recommends abolition, 3 January 2007, http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGAMR510032007). There are also other signs that the USA is slowly turning against capital punishment (see USA : The experiment that failed : A reflection on 30 years of judicial killing, 16 January 2007, http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGAMR510112007).
There is strong public support for a moratorium on executions in North Carolina. Approximately 1,000 faith group congregations, businesses and community groups have passed resolutions calling for a moratorium, including almost 40 local governments in the state. In addition, more than 40,000 people in North Carolina have signed the moratorium petition.
RECOMMENDED ACTION : Please send appeals to arrive as quickly as possible, in your own words, in English if possible :
noting the order issued by Judge Stephens ;
urging the Governor to use this opportunity to support a full moratorium on executions in North Carolina, noting the widespread public support for such a measure.
APPEALS TO :
Governor Michael F. Easley
20301 Mail Services Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-0301, USA
Email : firstname.lastname@example.org
(via website) http://www.governor.state.nc.us/email.asp?to’1.
Fax : +1 919 733-2120
+1 919 715-3175
Salutation : Dear Governor
Ambassade des Etats-Unis d’Amérique
Boulevard du Régent 27
Fax : 02.511.27.25
PLEASE SEND APPEALS IMMEDIATELY. Check with the International Secretariat, or your section office, if sending appeals after 9 March 2007.
Le B-A.BA du membre des Actions Urgentes
Nous ne remercions jamais assez les membres des Actions Urgente (AU) pour le temps et l’engagement dont ils font preuve chaque mois : sans eux, le réseau des AU n’aurait pas le poids qu’il a face aux autorités que nous visons. Pourtant, et on ne peut leur en vouloir, certains participants se désinscrivent très vite, souvent parce qu’ils ne s’étaient pas rendu compte de ce à quoi ils s’étaient engagés. Voici une sorte de charte du participant pour éviter les malentendus :
Agir le plus vite possible pour la/les personnes visées par l’action.
Respecter les consignes d’écritures fournies avec l’action : attention, nous ne fournissons pas de modèle de lettre.
Faire suivre à l’équipe des AU toute réponse d’ambassades ou des autorités suite à l’envoi d’une lettre/fax/e-mail.
Nous tenir informés de votre changement d’adresse (même – et surtout – d’e-mail).
Quand vous agissez pour une action urgente, vous vous engagez à agir pour toutes les mises-à-jour (ou "follow-up" dans notre jargon) qui suivront et qui souvent vous demandent de continuer à agir. Par contre, ces mises-à-jour ne sont pas comptabilisées dans votre quota d’actions mensuel.
Vous retrouverez les bonnes nouvelles du mois ici :